×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 1,165 articles on Loathsome Characters Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    Loathsome Characters Wiki

    About this board

    Not editable

    SuperSonic203 (talkcontribs)

    Your saying Rumble isn't Average. How am I disrespecting your views on reviews. It's probably just one negative review. Okay? Like what Wikipedia users say, reception is still mixed, no what you see. Okay? I know you don't like Rumble. That is completely fine. More reviews for the movie is still mixed aside from Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic. Therefore is not panned. It's panned for you. But for anybody, no. It's not necessarily a bad movie by any means. Reviews are mixed.

    Wikiti98 (talkcontribs)

    But the film was so incredibly disappointing and completely disrespectful unfaithful to its source material. Even paramount studios seems to think the film is awful as they barely advertised it, placed it on paramount+ from theaters, and rescinded its delay. The film is practically obscure now from the hot lineups of paramount plus and is extremely likely that the film is a financial failure.

    Wikiti98 (talkcontribs)

    You are not respecting my opinion by implying that film was not disappointing. It is very disappointing. This film does not deserve the praise it received. It butchered tentacular, disrespected the source material, was lazily written, had highly rushed pacing, and almost every single character in the film was one dimensional and unlikable. The rumble characters that are on the loathsome characters website have hurt the film significantly.

    SuperSonic203 (talkcontribs)

    I'm not saying you like it. It's fine that you don't like the movie. You find it disappointing. We respect your opinion. But what I'm trying to say is that, it's not based on your view, only the critics. Only Rotten Tomatoes is negative whereas other sites such as Metacritic are mixed. So, Just because you don't like the movie and find it disappointing does not necessarily mean it's panned.

    Wikiti98 (talkcontribs)

    Well I think some of the the people who misguidedly praised rumble didn’t read the source material so that they would know exactly what it is based on. One of the reasons why several people including myself hate the film is because it is completely disrespectful and unfaithful to the source materialS it is based on the graphic novel, monster on the hill by Rob Harrell. Because of the novel’s format it should have been very easy for the writers to adapt it but instead they failed to understand it and chose to create their own cliched story out of it.

    about the reason you removed

    5
    Gumballrules2023 (talkcontribs)

    I didn’t write the part about knuckles and Amy dying. I don’t know who wrote that.

    Wikiti98 (talkcontribs)

    Halofan did that. It just sounded very ludicrous and nonsensical that he said that

    Gumballrules2023 (talkcontribs)

    I’m aware of that. I am welcome to help with my zavok page. And I understand if that sounded ludicrous and nonsensical.

    Halofan (talkcontribs)

    My apologies, I didn't know what I was thinking when I wrote something that was clearly nonsense.

    Gumballrules2023 (talkcontribs)

    It’s ok. Please just phrase it better. So it doesn’t sound like zavok killed knuckles and Amy.

    About the Roger Smith page

    2
    Boo aaaaahhh (talkcontribs)

    Thank you for backing me on my point. We are both in agreeance that Roger has yet to redeem himself right? Also, I kinda forgot to change some things on the page when I moved it back to seasons 8-present.

    Wikiti98 (talkcontribs)

    Yes. Not only has Roger not been redeemed but I believe that he is beyond any form of redemption whatsoever. The Frannie 911 episode completely butchered him as a character in terms of that he has to be bad or die. He then got more more scummy with every passing season, indicating that the writers wanted him to be loathsome. Watchmojo even declared him irredeemable in one of their lists.

    NelvanaFan1971 (talkcontribs)

    He has been banned from Miraheze due to his negative reviews and since then Miraheze snubbed him forever

    SuperStreetKombat (talkcontribs)

    Dude, why are you talking about a user who hasn't even gotten into an argument with Wikiti98 since last month just now? The feud between them is over, and there's no need to continue an otherwise dead conversation.

    NelvanaFan1971 (talkcontribs)

    Alright then he was banned many years ago so I’ll delete those comments

    NelvanaFan1971 (talkcontribs)

    You don’t need to worry about that anymore

    Raidarr (talkcontribs)

    Yeah, I doubt he was banned from Miraheze simply for having negative reviews. Assuming you mean literally banned from the platform, ie locked.

    NelvanaFan1971 (talkcontribs)

    I have also stopped ranting and I have planned to not be banned from Miraheze after I stop posting comments

    Raidarr (talkcontribs)

    Planning not to be banned does sound wise.

    NelvanaFan1971 (talkcontribs)

    Thank you

    NelvanaFan1971 (talkcontribs)

    I have decided to not rant anymore

    Wikiti98 (talkcontribs)

    Look NelvanaFan, you previously made that promise before and you broke it this week. I can’t trust you right now because of this. I have already reported you to the admins.

    There are no older topics
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

    Recent changes

  • Supermanjustin113 • 15 minutes ago
  • Collei • 3 hours ago
  • SpongeSharko03 • 3 hours ago
  • Collei • 3 hours ago
  • Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.