User talk:Connall2021

Then what do you propose for Norman to be more naughty without loathsome, hmm?

Davidtjbrennan, like what JigglypuffGuy04 said to you a few times now, Normanʼs naughty nature in the CGI seasons is not ”character expansion” and has no ”good potential” at all, itʼs flanderization with him becoming a loud, whiny and selfish jerk who forcefully does stupid and horrible things to inconsiderably get what he wants. Also, you definitely hid JigglypuffGuy04ʼs message in your topic in his talk page at first because you didnʼt want to handle criticism. Add that so-called redeeming quality again and Iʼm reporting you to one of the admins.

That's because you're all just negative instead of positive and saw that Norman's increase in naughty makes him better with playing tricks and causing emergencies. The crew wouldn't want that from you.

Ever heard of increase in character trait? That's what it is for Norman's naughty nature in CGI and it's great for playing tricks and causing emergencies.

Increase in character trait may be considered flanderization.

No, it's not. More naughty is good to me like helping characters be more of who they are.

Alright Davidtjbrennan, that’s it! I’m now requesting one of the admins to block you since you keep denying the fact that Norman Price got flanderized in the CGI seasons of Fireman Sam by adding a so-called ”redeeming quality“ about Norman’s naughty nature being ”character expansion“ and having ”good potential“ and saying it multiple times in myself and JigglypuffGuy04’s talk pages. We tried saying to you that Norman got flanderized horribly in these seasons, but you kept ignoring our constructive critisism by making up silly excuses. 😡💢💢

I'm not making excuses or denying anything. Just stating my honest thoughts on Norman's naughty nature being increased and don't like criticism. Do you want me to lie and prefer if Norman remains the same in the CGI era from the first five seasons with no increase?

Listen, everyone has different thoughts and you're not changing them, even mine.

Not making excuses. Just be honest and expressing my thoughts.

Ok, but what about other arctics, such as Mac's mom? Hoe comes that stays, and yet you gonna remove the Lead Cop?

Can you please explain that?

What does that article have to do with why the Lead Cop one has to be deleted? Also, like I said before, Suppai already told you multiple times why he/she wanted your "Lead Cop" page to be deleted to the point of typing out everything wrong with the page in that page’s dicussion tab, and you were just oblivious about it and decided to edit war with Suppai over that by constantly removing the deletion tag. So now, I’ll be requesting DarkMatterMan4500 to block you because of your edit warring and delete said page.

Well, please don't block me, and please don't delete the Lead Cop page.

Augustborn1996, that page is getting deleted because Suppai has provided some really valid points and he was also well detailed about it too. I think you just like forcing in articles for the sake of your opinion like the Season 3 of Foster's article on the TTS&EW, which Connall2021 thankfully changed it to a blog instead. You always do that and you have a long history of getting confrontational with other users whenever they revert your edits or tag the articles you've created for deletion. So your "discussions" don't really come off as questions, but rather standoff-ish.

I'm just saying.

The page for Mac’s Mom is tagged for deletion. I would like it to stay that away unless there’s a compelling counter argument.