I just don’t want to take a chance of being blocked, I’m gonna only from now on only add reasons why a character sucks and their redeeming qualities. Plus, I thought Parody Characters only meant characters from YouTube. Also, Dick Hardly is also a villain and what South Park Mickey Mouse did was just as bad as what Dick did.
Topic on Talk:Loathsome Characters Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[Title removed for Vandalism - CVT action]
I think you missed the other reason of why the page was deleted. Like you seem to be aware of, South Park Mickey Mouse is a VILLAIN, so his primary role is to do "bad things", and he's a physical representation of Disney's greedy side. If he's just here because he does bad things, why don't we add Scar, Claude Frollo and Maleficent? That's the main reason why I introduced the rule of pages about mean/villanous characters having much stricter standards. And the deletion of parody characters isn't limited to YouTube, because I have had to delete Robot Chicken parody characters before. But I don't recommend you stop making pages, you just need to have a general idea of what kind of character to add.
Maybe you should have made that article a sandbox rather than an official page. I had the same idea of getting blocked too.
So basically if I added a villain to the wiki, the villain has to be poorly-written or only existing for a pathetic reason?
So I was thinking of adding Kikyo on the wiki. It’s not because of her villainous deeds, it’s because she has no purpose of existing other than making the romance between InuYasha and Kagome more complicated. Her moves are also pretty predictable, her character development isn’t exactly great, and she doesn’t contribute that much in the anime.
I don't know about this Kikyo, but from the way you describe her I think she qualifies for this wiki.
Even though South Park's Mickey is forbidden, FUCK HIM, I seriously hope someone makes a positive parody of Mickey some day in order to break the streak of Mickey not being portrayed positively, he even makes MAD'S Mickey look like the actual Mickey in comparision
I know you're a fricking Mickey Mouse stan, but he is portrayed negatively because he is Disney's mascot, and Disney has been known to be getting greedier and greedier these days. They use Mickey as a physical representation of that. In fact, when something goes wrong in Disney company-wise, people often refer to the high royals at Disney as "the mouse" as a joke. But if you're a little sensitive to misrepresentation of your favorite cartoon icons, all I can say is just stick to the real Mick.