×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 1,165 articles on Loathsome Characters Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    Loathsome Characters Wiki

    Talk:Mr. Krabs (seasons 6-10)

    About this board

    Not editable

    Why were my edits taken away?

    4
    The Super MarioBobFan Bros. Movie (talkcontribs)
    The Super MarioBobFan Bros. Movie (talkcontribs)

    Wouldn't Mr. Krabs technically be likable in SpongeBob's Road to Christmas since he makes only two cameos and doesn't do anything bad or is unlikable. Also, Mr. Krabs would technically be likable in a lot of episodes, such as ones where he makes a minor appearance or cameo.

    ShawnTehLogoBoi (talkcontribs)

    The reason your edits on this page were taken away is because it's unknown if he was tolerable in SpongeBob's Road to Christmas.

    The Super MarioBobFan Bros. Movie (talkcontribs)

    OK. If Mr. Krabs had played a bigger role in that episode like going along with SpongeBob, Patrick, and Plankton to the North Pole to give Santa a present, then he would be tolerable.

    Money12123 (talkcontribs)

    Note to any admins: Feel free to move this back to Eugene Krabs, I couldn't do it because I'm not an admin or a content moderator, so unfortunately, you're going to have to do it.

    ExploringEditor (talkcontribs)

    ok

    Should the article be renamed to Mr. Krabs (Seasons 6-8) instead?

    14
    Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

    Several users in general think this article should be renamed to “Mr. Krabs (Seasons 6-8)” instead of the current name because they don’t think he is that bad of a character. But several other users (like myself) don’t seem to think that is saying much because according to some accurate sources on the Mr. Krabs article at Wikipedia, the character got mixed reviews throughout the show’s run, with criticism primarily directed at his greed.

    Additionally, the way the entire article is written sounds more like it is talking about his character as a whole and not just in Seasons 6-8. Personally, I would prefer that the article should stay the way it is to mention his character as a whole, and not just Seasons 6-8, because as I stated earlier, the character got mixed reviews. The term “mixed” means only half of people adore the character while the other half of the people loathe the character, which is why I think the article should stay the way it is.

    Anyone else agrees or disagrees? I have no objections to have the article renamed. So it’s okay. So again, anyone agrees or disagrees? Share your thoughts.

    NTM (talkcontribs)

    Sure.

    SuperStreetKombat (talkcontribs)

    I definitely agree that it should be renamed "Mr. Krabs (Seasons 6-8)". As I've said before, the character as a whole is a fan-favorite, but he was flanderized in the later seasons.

    Plus, he's supposed to be greedy; it's who he is.

    Th548 (talkcontribs)

    He was kind of okay in the first episode of SpongeBob.

    Jay Mitch (talkcontribs)

    I like Mr. Krabs IMO, but I don't think it should just focus on 6-8. The page is good how it is.

    Neat Structure (talkcontribs)

    Jay Mitch, I agree with you.

    AlfeProblemSolverz (talkcontribs)

    Despite his cruel behavior at times in early seasons, I can't help but say that it should say Krabs (Seasons 6-8) because he is a Fan-Favorite, not to mention, his flanderization was so obvious in Seasons 6-8 as the writers cranked it up.

    SuperStreetKombat (talkcontribs)

    I agree, Alfe.

    Suppai (talkcontribs)

    Mr. Krabs' page, which appears to be well written, talks about more than just Season 6-8, so no change is necessary.

    Suppai (talkcontribs)

    If he is more of a fan favorite on the show like Squidward, he would have another page on the Great Characters Wiki as well right?

    AlfeProblemSolverz (talkcontribs)

    Yes. I'm guessing that he has too much flaws to be on that wiki. That is why he might on this wiki instead.

    Suppai (talkcontribs)

    Mr. Krabs cannot be on the other wiki because he has 'too many flaws', yet a villainous protagonist such as Eric Cartman is allowed to have a page there?

    Money12123 (talkcontribs)

    @Suppai I think he's there because he is quote "clearly supposed to be a character who is an example of what not to do".

    RoboticBloxxer (talkcontribs)

    did he redeem himself?

    Jaredqwe (talkcontribs)

    Somewhat, but his greed is reeled in very much

    Portrock1566 (talkcontribs)

    No. He still hasn't recovered from flanderization.

    RoboticBloxxer (talkcontribs)

    okay.

    MirahezeGDPR d583ee3d369568c21bc0a937bb34e06a (talkcontribs)

    Let’s delete this page.

    There are no older topics
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.