Ghostbusters (2016)

From Loathsome Characters Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
" The Ghostbusters is the people who didn't want to call. "

The Ghostbusters (2016) are the main four characters in the film's 2016 reboot of Ghostbusters.

Why They Suck

  1. As all of them being female Ghostbusters in the film, they have no purpose whatsoever. Instead, their creation is all about political agendas rather than being Ghostbusters or entertaining an audience.
  2. All of them severely lack chemistry and charisma, and are portrayed as obnoxious in the film.
  3. The performances by the actresses are poor and the comedy that comes from them is not funny.
    • The jokes that come out of the mouths are unfunny like flatulence jokes, burp jokes and poorly executed sex jokes.
  4. The four new Ghostbusters even stole the equipment to build the Proton packs instead of building them from scratch.
  5. They are spoiled, whiny brats throughout the film, especially Abby when she whines about getting only one wonton in her soup.
  6. Erin intentionally releases a ghost, killing Bill Murray because she was mad.
  7. Patty is a walking stereotype.

The Only Redeeming Quality

  1. These characters along with the film have been declared non-canon to the Ghostbusters series due to being propaganda characters.

Comments

You are not allowed to post comments.


avatar

BlueReacts

one month ago
Score 3
Who you gonna call? the female Ghostbusters?! nah...
avatar

CoffiMill

5 months ago
Score 1

¨I mean, Four female ghostbusters?, the feminist are taking over!


I AM ADULT VIRGIN¨
avatar

CoffiMill

5 months ago
Score 1
Yeah no funny :(
avatar

Anonymous user #1

11 months ago
Score 2 You
There is absolutely no redeeming qualities to these ghostbusters!
avatar

Anonymous user #1

12 months ago
Score 2 You
This movie is a completely terrible way to soil on the original movie.
avatar

Anonymous user #1

13 months ago
Score 0 You
Boom, the risky escape (a Roblox film you can’t see yet) is much better than ghostbusters 2016
avatar

Anonymous user #1

13 months ago
Score 0 You
Fun fact: the risky escape was formerly named as Yeet (yes, the original title of this film was Yeet) though later during production, one of the actors asked the director (mrs blue cupcake) to name the film 'Crime Doesn’t Pay, I would like to use the title 'Crime Doesn’t Pay' after the words of 'The Risky Escape' so the title of the finished film will be ' The Risky Escape: Crime Doesn’t Pay '
avatar

Anonymous user #1

13 months ago
Score 0 You
Correction: I accidentally typed her instead of them.
avatar

Anonymous user #1

13 months ago
Score 2 You
Since of ya liked the diapered Usagi pic, herrrrrrrres The 2016 Ghostbusters! XD Well, since they are all crybabies, it suits her very well, heheh. Will the original Ghostbusters find this as an insult to them or will they non-stoppingly make fun of them causing them to cry, and then I have to change the 2016 Ghostbusters' diapers, and maybe after after that, I could give their sexy cute feet by playing "This Little Piggy" with their cute little toes, and then I could sing "Wock-a-Bye Baby", to put'em to sleep. Will they cwy all night because they have to wear diapers because they're crybabies? I'd like to see'em try!!!XDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXD
avatar

Animdude64

19 months ago
Score 8
I have nothing against girls taking male roles, but the problem is how the ghostbusters here are portrayed and how the story is being told. I'm not sexist, I'm just picky when it comes to storytelling.
avatar

Se

21 months ago
Score -7
Here’s a replacement redeeming quality in my opinion: They could not have been on this wiki if they had the same charisma as the originals and if they kept their original genders and haven’t been have for political reasons.
avatar

Matthew The Guy

21 months ago
Score 8
That's kind of a pointless redeeming quality, and certainly doesn't excuse this movie's existence.