×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 1,082 articles on Loathsome Characters Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    Loathsome Characters Wiki


    Artemis Fowl
    Yeah, "fowl" is right!
    Gender: Male
    Type: Cocky and arrogant version of Artemis Fowl
    Age: 12
    Species: Human
    Portrayed by: Ferdia Shaw
    Status: Alive
    Media of origin: Artemis Fowl


    Artemis Fowl II is the titular main protagonist of the Artemis Fowl book series. He starts out as a villain and serves as the protagonist villain of the first book, but he gets redemption throughout the series.

    This article will focus on his flanderization film representation from the 2020 adaptation of the same name, where Ferdia Shaw portrayed him.

    Why He Was a Fowl Indeed

    1. Like the rest of the characters in the film, we never get to care about him since the movie never shows us why we should care and just tells us who he is expecting us just to know.
    2. He's meant to be portrayed as a child prodigy and mastermind like in the original books -- and the movie constantly gives their phrases to him, including the opening -- but we never actually see any of those claims backed up. As a result, when we see him acting cocky and arrogant to various people, it will most likely just make the audience dislike him and make him come across as a Gary Stu.
      • The closest we get to see to his genius at the beginning is when we see his incredible surfing skills at the opening, and even that has little-to-no connection with any prodigy skills. Then, 20 minutes in, we finally get to see it again when he's searching for his late father's journal... which involves remembering the poem his father told him every night before bed, and assuming it was a clue for the journal.
      • Also, the rest of the time, he just makes crazily detailed plans just because he sees pictures and gives away information, he has no way of knowing about.
    3. He's almost completely unfaithful to the character from the original novels. To name a few pointers:
      • This version is purely heroic and unaware of the fairy world or his family's involvement in crime rather than the villain protagonist and deliberate kidnapper of a fairy (who would later go through redemption) he was in the books.
      • Early on in the film, Artemis goes surfing, even though the very first page of the first book, specifically said "Sun did not suit Artemis.", not to mention his lack of physical strength became a running gag throughout the series. Man, it's like they weren't even trying to follow the books.
      • Artemis is being raised by his father, whereas in the books his father is gone, and he lives with his mentally ill mother — something that drives the majority of the plot of the first and second books.
      • Artemis in this movie also wears jeans in one scene, something Artemis in the book swore he would never do and despised even thinking about it.
      • He's far more emotional than in the book reacting to getting the news about his father by screaming, dropping a jug of milk, and needing to be physically carried away from the television.
    4. The changes may have been forgivable if the character had an actual personality, but he doesn't. He's just your generic protagonist within the completely unoriginal script.
      1. Also, director Kenneth Branagh made the changes because he didn't think audiences could handle a 12-year-old villainous character.
    5. On top of trying to be more heroic than his literature counterpart, he's not even good at it. As he still does several questionable acts that resemble the book Fowl, making it unclear if it's trying to be its own thing or if they're following the books because it fails at both.
    6. Being played by the wasted talent of Ferdia Shaw, who is the grandson of the late actor Robert Shaw, he did a really poor job at playing Artemis Fowl, despite looking the part. Aside from having a minor role in the film Poster Boys, which was released the same year as this movie, the actor didn't have any other films that he starred in, pretty much killing his career before it even began.

    Redeeming Qualities

    Note: These redeeming qualities do not excuse the actions that the character had performed.

    1. His clothes are one of the only things faithful to the book.
    2. Admittedly, he is a much better character outside of this movie, which basically makes his flanderization even sadder.

    Videos


    Comments That Aren't A Fowl

    Loading comments...